Fish Market Like Situation During PPDT : During the PPDT, candidates frequently ask how to handle a fish market-like situation. This is an important question because, in many PPDT and GD conversations, all candidates speak up at the same time and refuse to back down despite repeated warnings from the conducting officer. The two main causes for this are as follows: –
Task without a leader : Because there is no designated leader in the group, this is a work that requires no leadership. With a rejection rate of approximately 60% during screening, all candidates are eager to do well and hence begin speaking out and allowing others to talk.
Coaching that is ineffective : Many academies encourage their pupils to speak up as much as possible in order for their tale to be chosen as the collective story. As a result, candidates talk and, in many cases, begin shouting at the top of their lungs in order to be heard.
Fish Market Like Situation During PPDT : Whatever the reason, the majority of people die as a result of it. Candidates who are bashful and too devout rarely speak and remain silent, while those who are raucous bang the table with their opinions. Both of these approaches are certain to fail.
The SSB test is used to evaluate candidates’ leadership potential. As a result, except for the Command Task, practically all practical tasks, including those in the Group Testing Series, are leaderless. When a candidate speaks first in a discussion, it demonstrates his initiative and self-assurance. We can measure his intellect, power of communication, and logic based on the contents spoken.
His demeanour toward others, as well as how he handles opposing viewpoints and collaborates to reach an agreement, demonstrates his capacity to influence his group, as well as his adaptability, tact, diplomacy, determination, courage, mental stamina, and liveliness. As a result, if a candidate keeps silent, the assessors are unable to evaluate him or her. Candidates who are domineering and disruptive, on the other side, are perceived as selfish and uncooperative. Even if their content is questionable, such candidates should be considered.
Unfortunately, because each group will be distinct in terms of composition, it is difficult to explain in worlds how to approach this scenario practically. Nonetheless, you can use the following four strategies:
Concentrate : While others are narrating the story, pay close attention to them. Look for candidates’ chest numbers who have similar stories to yours. Take note of the general agreement on the number of characters, their age, and gender.
Prepare to shoot : Prepare to shoot your first line after you’ve taken note of the aforementioned. Shoot as soon as the last participant completes his narration. “Friends, the stories of chest nos —,—,—– and —– were similar and intriguing, so let’s create that the common story,” say they. Allow for a brief pause as you await responses. You have now demonstrated your self-assurance, initiative, and bravery.
Taking Care of the Confusion : As soon as you stop, chaos will ensue, and everyone will talk at the same time. You must take action and encourage them to speak one by one. Make sure you’re not being nasty or naming someone in particular. Keep pleading for a while, and I’m confident no one will give in.
Be A Roman in Rome : When no one is cooperating, start explaining why you like the narrative and why it should be converted into a group story with minimal changes. Continue to explain your reasoning, and accept and include someone else’s point of view in the group story if it appeals to you. This will disclose your logic, intellect, expressive power, influence, decision-making, determination, and liveliness, among other things. At this point, it’ll suffice.
